1 APHC010569702023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6292/2023 Between: 1. M/S.KALYANI CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO. 8-562, BEHIND VIJAYALAKSHMI TYRE AGENCIES, MAIN ROAD, RAVULAPALEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MEDAPATI ANJANEYA REDDY. 2. MEDAPATI ANJANEYA REDDY, S/O. SUBBI REDDY, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC., CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 8-437/A, RAVULAPALEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI PRADHYUMNA PS IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS (R AND B) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. D RAMU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, AMALAPURAM, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S NISCHALA REDDY 2. ASHOK RAM V The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6292/2023 O R D E R: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.14729 of 2023 on 06.07.2023, wherein this Court passed the following order: “… The Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release Rs.4,89,38,626/- to the petitioners within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. It is open to the petitioner to agitate his claim for interest, if any, payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs". 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Vijayaraju (19765), learned Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the order dated 06.07.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.14729 of 2023 has been complied-with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _______________________ SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KS Dated 13.03.2026. 4 68 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6292/2023 DATED 13.03.2026 KS