APHC010572572013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30584/2013 Between: 1. V.RAJA RATNA KUMARI,, W/O. V.SRINIVAS RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.64-10-9, RAMA KRISHNA NAGAR, RAJHAMUNDRY, W.G. DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE VICECHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR APSRTC, BUS BHAVAN, MUSHIRABAD, HYDERABAD, A.P. 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER APSRTC WEST GODAVARI REGION, ELURU, A.P. 3. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC TANUKU BUS DEPOT, W.G.DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner to any suitable post on compassionate grounds is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unjust and unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner into any suitable post on compassionate grounds (under breadwinner scheme) in the respondent corporation forthwith and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37976 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment into any suitable post on compassionate grounds (under breadwinner scheme) by allowing the petitioner for interview on 2510-2013 or subsequent date to the post of conductor in West Godavari Region forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P VENKATESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S V RAMANA The Court made the following: 3 Order:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in pursuance of the interim orders passed by this Court on 24.10.2013, the respondents have passed proceedings dated 21.12.2013 rejecting the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment under the breadwinner scheme. 3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to challenge the subsequent proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 10.03.2026 PNS