Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25616 (JHR)

NOIMUDDIN MOLLA @ NAIMIDDIN MOLLA @ NAIMUDDIN MOLLA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5115/2026 · 2026-09-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:27029] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5115 of 2026 Noimuddin Molla @ Naimuddin Molla, aged about 50 years, son of Khosjan Molla, residence of Village Hariyoka (Patharchili), P.O. & P.S. Nalhati, District- Birbhum (West Bengal). ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Sushma Aind, A.P.P. ------ 04/ 10.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakuria P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 126, 115(2), 117(2), 109, 103 read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the one of the brother of co-accused Sufida Bibi, who has been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail by this court in A.B.A. No. 3534 of 2026. He next submits that there is dispute between the husband and wife namely, Jakir Shekh and Sufida Bibi, moreover, prior to this case, the daughter of Sufida Bibi had lodged a case under section 498(A) of I.P.C against the relative of Faruk Shekh (informant) and to take revenge from Safuda Bibi and her family, the informant has lodged the present case against the petitioner. He also submits that the other co-accused persons have also been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail by this court in A.B.A. No. 3345 of 2026. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. [2026:JHHC:27029] -2- 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of making assault. On this ground, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons of making assault and it has been stated in the petition in para-12 that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and the petitioner is said to be the brother of Sufida Bibi, who has lodged a case against the informant side and the present case has been lodged by the informant side, in which, entire family members have been made accused. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within four weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Pakur, in connection with Pakuria P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-10.09.2026 Amitesh/-