Neutral Citation No. (2026:JHHC:27386) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.269 of 2024 ----- 1. Praduman Prasad Sahu, son of Lukan Sahu, resident of Village Banasadi, P.O. & P.S. Simaria, District Chatra. 2. Dilip Kumar, son of Late Rambilas Ram, resident of Village Banasadi, P.O. & P.S. Simaria, District Chatra. 3. Gopal Saw, son of Dwarika Saw, resident of village Manatu, P.O. Tutilawa, P.S. Simaria, District Chatra. 4. Sudip Kumar Gupta, son of Jagnnath Lal Gupta, resident of Delho, P.O. Delho, P.S. Simaria, District Chatra. .......... Petitioners. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jadhav Vijaya Narayan Rao, the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro. 3. Madhvi Mishra, the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad. 4. Naman Priyesh Lakhra, the Deputy Commissioner, Giridih. 5. Ramesh Gholap, the Deputy Commissioner, Chatra. 6. Megha Bhardwaj, the Deputy Commissioner, Koderma. 7. Anjaneyulu Dodde, the Deputy Commissioner, Dumka. 8. Mrityunjay Kumar Baranwal, the Deputy Commissioner, Pakur. 9. Vishal Sagar, the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar. 10. Hemant Sati, the Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj. 11. Kumud Sahay, the Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara. 12. Zeeshan Qamer, the Deputy Commissioner, Godda. 13. Chandan Kumar, the Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh. 14. Nancy Sahay, the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh. .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nirupama, AC to Sr. SC-II ----- Order No.06 Date: 11.09.2026 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their wilful and deliberate violation of the order dated 17th October, 2023 passed in W.P.(S) No.1896 of 2022. 2. Mrs. Nirupama, learned AC to Sr. SC-II refers to the show cause affidavits filed on behalf of the respective opposite parties and submits that the cases of the petitioners have been reconsidered Neutral Citation No. (2026:JHHC:27386) in terms with the order dated 17th October, 2023 passed by this Court and since it was found that they had scored lesser marks than those obtained by last selected candidates in the respective categories, the petitioners’ claims for being appointed as Assistant Teachers in respective categories, have been rejected. It is, thus, submitted that the aforesaid order of this Court has been complied. 3. Considering the said fact, there is no need to further proceed in the matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is hereby dropped. 4. The present contempt case stands disposed of. 5. The petitioners are, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse against the order(s) of reconsideration passed against them, as permissible under law. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 11th September, 2026 Sanjay/ Uploaded on 11.09.2026