APHC010580072004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 3511/2004 Between: 1. D. LAXMI, W/O. LATE D. SURYANARAYANA 6-168/7 CHINAGADILI VISAKHAPATNAM 2. D. JAYA BHANU VENKATANAGESH, S/O. LATE D. SURYANARAYANA 6-168/7 CHINAGADILI VISAKHAPATNAM ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. SURYAKANTHAM, W/O. LATE DALAI SURYANARAFYANA R/O. JAMI VIZIANAGARAM DT. 2. DEMUDAMMA, W/O. LATE DALAI SURYAFNARAYANA R/O. 52-14-5/1 RESAPUVANIPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE STAE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DISTRICT COLLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against the Judgement and Decree dated 25.9.2002 in OS No. 35 of 1999 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(ASMP 13281 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing the certified 2 copy of the Judgement made in OS No. 35 of 99 dated 25.9.2002 on the file of tlhe Family Court Visakhapatnam. IA NO: 2 OF 2004(ASMP 13282 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 584 days in representing the above appeal Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 3578/2004 Between: 1. D. LAXMI, W/O. LATE DALAI SURYANARAYANA R/O. 6- 168/7 CHINAGADILI VISAKHAPATNAM 2. D. JAYA BANU VENKATANAGESH, S/O. LATE DALAI SURYANARAYANA R/O. 6-168/7 CHINAGADILI VISAKHAPATNAM ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. SURYAKANTHAM, W/O. LATE D. SURYANARAYANA R/O. JAMI VIZIANAGARAM DT. 2. DEMUDAMMA, W/O. SURYANARAYANA R/O. 52-14-5/1 RESAPUVANIPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM 3. THE STATE OF A P, DISTRICT COLLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against the Judgement and Decree dated 25.9.2002 in OS NO. 35 of 1999 passed fby the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, IA NO: 1 OF 2004(ASMP 13276 OF 2004 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 581 days in respresenting the above appeal Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 11.12.2025, the following order was passed: < At request of learned counsel for the appellant, post after two weeks along with A.S.No.3578 of 2004 under the same caption.= 2. Challenging the dismissal of the suit in O.S.No.35 of 1999, A.S.No.3578 of 2004 has been filed and challenging the decree of the counter claim in O.S.No.35 of 1999, A.S.No.3511 of 2004 has been filed. 3. The appellants are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.35 of 1999 and defendants 1 to 3 in counter claim No.35 of 1999. 4. No representation for the appellants. 5. Both the Appeal Suits are dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. 4 _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 07.01.2026 Pab 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NOs: 3511 and 3578 of 2004 DATE: 07.01.2026 Pab