IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45362 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2026 Thana- KIUL District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Anwari Khatun W/O Md. Rashid Resident of Village - Hakimganj, P.S. - Kiul, District - Lakhisarai. 2. Md. Akhtar Raja S/O Md. Rashid R/O Village- Hakimganj, P.S- Kiul, Distt.- Lakhisarai. 3. Naj Khatun @ Naj Praveen W/O Md. Azad @ Md. Ajad R/O Village- Hakimganj, P.S- Kiul, Distt.- Lakhisarai. 4. Ishrat Khatun W/O Md. Shahid R/O Village- Hakimganj, P.S- Kiul, Distt.- Lakhisarai. 5. Md. Mursid @ Mursid S/O Md. Shahid R/O Village- Hakimganj, P.S- Kiul, Distt.- Lakhisarai. 6. Md. Rashid S/O Md. Anwar @ Md. Anabar R/O Village- Hakimganj, P.S- Kiul, Distt.- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rabi Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 20-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 89, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4 are women and the informant alleges that on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45362 of 2026(3) dt.20-07-2026 2/3 23.02.2026 at 7.00 A.M., accused persons (petitioners) came and Anwari Khatun started abusing. On objection, all accused persons assaulted her leading to abortion of pregnancy of three months. Further, doctor disclosed that on account of assault, the pregnancy was aborted. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that in order to give seriousness to the case, it is alleged that on account of assault, her pregnancy was aborted. It is next submitted that informant does not disclose who was the doctor, who treated her. It is further submitted that the date of occurrence is 23.02.2026 and the FIR was instituted on 01.03.2026 i.e. after a delay of more than seven days. It is also submitted that a supplementary affidavit has been filed wherein a specific pleading has been made that there is no certificate of doctor on record. It is further submitted that even parties have compromised as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45362 of 2026(3) dt.20-07-2026 3/3 event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Kiul P. S. Case No.22 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T