Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25601 (KAR)

SRI. MAHADEVASWAMY v. SRI. PUTTASHETTY

RSA/1400/2022 · 2026-07-01

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32834 RSA No. 1400 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1400 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI. MAHADEVASWAMY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O PUTTASHETTY R/AT MEGALAHUNDI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT - 571 313 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MAHADEVASWAMY, APPELLANT) AND: 1. SRI. PUTTASHETTY SINCE DEAD BY LRS SMT. VENKATAMMA AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS W/O LATE PUTASHETTY 2. SMT. RATHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS W/O KRISHNAPPA 3. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS W/O VENKATAPPA Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32834 RSA No. 1400 of 2022 4. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS W/O KRISHNASHETTY R/AT MASANAPURA KASABA HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT - 571 313 5. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY MAJOR S/O LATE PUTTASHETTY 6. SRI. RANGAIAH MAJOR S/O LATE PUTTASHETTY RESPONDENTS NO.1, 2, 3, 5 AND 6 ARE R/AT MEGALAHUNDI VILLAGE KASABA HOBI, CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT - 571 313 7. SMT. YASHODHAMMA MAJOR W/O LATE REVANNA R/AT CHANGACHAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, YELANDUR TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICRT - 571 441 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.08.2017 PASSED IN RA.NO.6/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHAMARAJANAGAR. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.08.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.148/2007 ON THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32834 RSA No. 1400 of 2022 FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHAMAGARAJANAGAR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Memo of retirement is filed by the learned counsel for the appellant. Office objections are not complied. Since the appellant has not chosen to engage any other counsel and office objections are not complied and appeal is of the year 2022, the appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution, by permitting the counsel for appellant to retire from the case. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21