Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 256 (GAU)

Taten Tapak and Anr v. The State of AP and Anr

WP(C)/62/2026 · 2026-02-18

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002372026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/62/2026 Taten Tapak and Anr Son of Tayem Tapak, resident of Riga Village, PO Riga, PS Boleng, Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Tabit Mibang Age: Occupation : Son of Shri T Mibang resident of Riga Village PO Riga PS Boleng Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and Anr represented by the Chief Secretary, Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, Tadar Bai,Biri Esther,K Gara,Wanglat Khomrang,E S NIDO MARI,Maklek Lego,Tame Rimi,Nabam Sonu,Bomyom Ori,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 19-02-2026 Page No.# 2/2 Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioners, who fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh as when the occasion arises as the simple prayer of the writ petitioner is for disposal of the representation filed before the Chief Secretary, Government of Arunachal Pradesh on 02.02.2026. Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents is present. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, prayer for withdrawal is accepted. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant