2026:HHC:42489 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1539 of 2026 IN CWP No.5655 of 2026 Decided on: 30.09.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Anjna Devi .....Petitioner Versus Ashish Kohli ....Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner has invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of the order dated 07.05.2026 [Annexure C-1], passed by this Court, in CWP No.5655 of 2026, titled as Anjna Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. The Operative part of the order reads as under:- “2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representation Annexure P-1) of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within 8 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law.” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:42489 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that neither the representation [Annexure P-1 annexed with the said Writ Petition] has been decided nor a speaking order has been conveyed to her as yet. 3. Heard. 4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the sole respondent. 5. At this stage, Learned Counsel for the petitioner on Instructions submits that petitioner shall be satisfied, in case, Respondent is directed to implement the order dated 07.05.2026 [Annexure C-1] in a time bound manner [Statement Taken on Record]. 6. Prayer being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also. 7. Considering the matter in above perspective and as prayed by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, instant petition is closed, with a direction to the Respondent to decide the representation [Annexure P-1], by passing a speaking order and to convey the decision [if not already conveyed], within six weeks from today. Notice issued to the respondent shall stand discharged, 3 2026:HHC:42489 accordingly. 8. Needless to say, that in case, the order passed by this Court, is not complied with, the petitioner is free to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 30, 2026 [Bhardwaj]