Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2559 (MAD)

K.GOPU v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/15079/2026 · 2026-04-17

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 15079 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 15079 of 2026 K.Gopu ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram district. 2. The Surveyor Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram district. 3. The Inspector of Police Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram district. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and fix the boundary stones of the petitioner’s land situated in Villupuram district, Villupuram Taluk, Mitta Mandagapattu village in survey No. 210/2 in this an extent of 26.50 Ares as per Challan No. 2026/ 0123/ 07/ 000444 dated 04.02.2026 and direct the 3rd respondent to give proper police protection to enable the 2nd respondent to measure the land. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15079 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R Ajay Richardson For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader (For R1 & R2) Mr.V.Meganathan Government Advocate (For R3) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 1 and 2 survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated 04.02.2026, with the assistance of the 3rd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on 04.02.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr. V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15079 of 2026 property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- (a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice. (b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 1 and 2, the 3rd respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. (d) There shall be no order as to costs. 17-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15079 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To 1. The Tahsildar Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram district. 2. The Surveyor Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram district. 3. The Inspector of Police Villupuram Taluk, Villupuram district. WP No. 15079 of 2026 17-04-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis