2026:JHHC:27080-DB p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6081 of 2024 M/s Darling Housing Private Limited having its office at 17, Indranagar, Kanke Road, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, District Ranchi, through its Director namely, Ankur Anil, aged about 40 years, son of Anil Kumar Singh, Resident of 17, Indira Nagar, Kanke Road, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S. Gonda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand ... Petitioner Versus 1. M/s. Central Coalfields Limited through its Chairman-cum- Managing Director having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, G.P.O. Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Director (Project), Central Coalfields Limited having its office at Darbhanga House, G.P.O. Ranchi P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Head of Department (Civil), Central Coalfields Limited having its office at Darbhanga House, Ranchi G.P.O., Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The General Manager (Civil)/ Welfare & Services, Central Coalfields Limited having its office at Darbhanga House, G.P.O. Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 5. The General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited Kuju Area, having its office at Kuju, P.O. Kuju, P.S. Kuju, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr Ankit Vishal, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr Sankalp Goswami, A.C. to Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Sr. Advocate --------- 05/Dated: 09.09.2026 1. Heard Mr Ankit Vishal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Sankalp Goswami, learned A.C. to Mr Amit Kumar Das, learned senior council, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2026:JHHC:27080-DB p. 2 2. Mr. Ankit Vishal, on instructions, states that in this petition, the challenge was to the blacklisting of the petitioner and to the orders terminating the contract with the petitioner and forfeiting the security deposit. The petitioner had also prayed for release of outstanding dues. 3. Mr. Ankit Vishal states that the order of blacklisting has now been withdrawn by the respondents and the challenge to the same no longer survives. Insofar as the remaining challenges and reliefs are concerned, Mr Ankit Vishal, submits that he has instructions to seek leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a suit or take out any other appropriate proceedings for redressal of those grievances. 4. Accordingly, we grant leave with liberty as prayed for. 5. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in the above terms. All contentions of all parties on merits of the matter are left open, since we have not adjudicated them. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) September 09, 2026 N.A.F.R. VK/Nandini Uploaded on 11.09.2026