2026:JHHC:26516 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6135 of 2026 ---------- Nisha Sinha aged about 54 wife of Vinay Kumar Sahay, resident of Village Gawan, P.O. and P.S. Gawan, District Giridih (Jharkhand). ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Primary Education, Development Jharkhand, Human Resources Department, having its office at Telephone Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi 3. Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, P.O. and P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. 4. District Superintendent of Education, Giridih, P.O. and P.S. Giridih, District Giridih. 5. Block Education Extension Officer, Gawan, P.O. and P.S. Gawan, District Giridih. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sachin Kumar, AC to SC-I ---------- 02/ 31.08.2026 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for direction upon the respondents to pay honorarium which has been held-up by the respondents from October, 2023 till date, except for the month of February, March, April, July of the year 2024. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach concerned respondents, so that her grievances raised in the writ application can be redressed. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since counter- affidavit has not been filed, if the petitioner so wishes, she may approach the concerned authorities for redressal of her grievances. 4. Having regard to the limited submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioner to file fresh representation before the respondent No. 4. The moment the respondent No. 4 will receive any such representation; he shall take decision in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations, 2026:JHHC:26516 2 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It goes without saying that if the decision is taken in favour of the petitioner, necessary consequential order be issued within a further period of four weeks. 6. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 31st August, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 11.09.2026