VISHAL GUPTA @ BISHAL GUPTA @ BISHAL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8396/2026 · 2026-09-10
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25565 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25565 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:27295
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8396 of 2026
Vishal Gupta @ Bishal Gupta @ Bishal Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Rakesh Kumar, resident of Bilasi Town, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, Advocate
---
02/10th September 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No. 188/2025 for the offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(5), 74, 76, 111(4), 3(5) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner in the FIR and the injured persons have suffered simple injuries. Two co-accused, namely, Abhay Giri and Ankit Jha have been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No. 8206 of 2026 vide order dated 07.09.2026, wherein it was submitted that the parties had settled their dispute. In the said case, the deposition of the informant was also produced before the Court, wherein he had turned hostile. The charge-sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2026 and may be enlarged on bail.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 8206 of 2026 and that the charge-sheet has already been submitted,
2026:JHHC:27295
2
the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No. 188/2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) The petitioner shall not disturb the informant party in any manner whatsoever. In the event of any such occurrence of disturbance, it shall be open to the informant party to move an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner before the concerned court. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bonds furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile numbers before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 10.09.2026
Uploaded On: 12.09.2026
Mukul/-