Nomula Prasada Rao v. M/s K.P.Estate and Developers
CC/1119/2014 · 2026-03-23
Balaji Medamalli
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25563 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25563 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010571212014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2102] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1119/2014 Between:
1. NOMULA PRASADA RAO, S/O KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 4-5-61/4, G.V.R. MAHILA COLLEGE ROAD, SAIBABA ROAD, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER AND
1. M/S K P ESTATE AND DEVELOPERS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER PALAKOLLU RAJESWARA RAO S/O RAGHAVAIAH, R/O D.NO. 5-91-18/5 K.P. BHAVAN, LAKSHMIPURAM, 4TH LINE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. PALAKOLLU RAJESWARA RAO, S/O RAGHAVAIAH, R/O D.NO. 5-9- 4, 2/17, BRODIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. PALAKOLLU SUJATHA, S/O PALAKOLLU RAJESWARA RAO D.NO.
5-19-4, 2/17, BRODIPET, GUNTUR DIST.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J RAJESWAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.
2
The Court made the following ORDER :
The contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 03.01.2014 passed in C.R.P.M.P.No.7168 of 2013 in C.R.P.No.5172 of
2013.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up, the Registry has placed on record, the order passed in C.R.P.No.5172 of 2013, whereby the main civil revision petition itself was dismissed as infructuous. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication.
3. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 24.03.2026 Dvs
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 89
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1119/2014 Dt: 24.03.2026 Dvs