RAMESH GANJHU ALIAS BODA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8304/2026 · 2026-09-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25559 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25559 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:27132] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8304 of 2026
Ramesh Ganjhu @boda, Aged about 39 years, S/O-Late Bagdu ganjhu, R/O Village- Bukru, P.O-Seregada, P. S Balumath, District-Latehar (Jharkhand)
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, Adv. For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl. PP
02 / 08.09.2026
Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner files supplementary affidavit in the court today. Keep the same in the record.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jobang P.S case No. 11/2020 instituted under Section 147/148/149/353/307/120(B)of the IPC and section 17 of CLA Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being a member of TSPC Extremist organization was the member of an unlawful assembly and used criminal force against the police personnel and deterred them from discharging their duties and also attempted to murder them by firing upon them. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and no gunshot injury has been sustained by any of the police personnel. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 14.05.2026, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the
other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused with similar allegations has already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 11.06.2026 passed in B.A. No. 2482 of 2026 hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Lohardaga in connection with Jobang P.S case No. 11/2020 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 08.09.2026
Smita/-