Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25556 (JHR)

M/S.MADAN PRASAD THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY KUMAR SAURAV v. JHARKHAND URJA SANCHARAN NIGAM LIMITED , THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/4206/2026 · 2026-09-10

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:27177-DB 1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4206 of 2026 1. M/s. Madan Prasad, Adityapur, Seraikela-Kharsawan, through its Authorized Signatory, Kumar Saurav 2. M/s. Basaveshwar Electricals Private Ltd., Vijayapura, Karnataka, through its Authorized Signatory, Kumar Saurav 3. M/s Madan Prasad in JV with Basaveshwar Electricals Private Limited, Adtiyapur, Saraikela-Kharsawan, through its Authorized Signatory, Kumar Saurav ….. Petitioners Versus 1. Jharkhand Urja Sancharan Nigam Limited, through its Managing Director, Ranchi 2. General Manager, C&M (NWBP), Jharkhand Urja Sancharan Nigam Limited, Ranchi 3. Tender Evaluation Committee, through its Chairman i.e. General Manager, C&M (NWPB), Jharkhand Urja Sacharan Nigam Limited, Ranchi 4. M/s. Weststone Infraprojects Private Limited, through its Managing Director, Ranchi 5. M/s. Suresh Techno Electro India LLP, through its Partner, Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh) 6. M/s. Shivalic Power Control Limited-Empowertrans Private Limited (Joint Venture), through its Authorized Signatory, Faridabad (Haryana) 7. M/s Weststone Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. JV with Suresh Techno Electro India, LLP, through its Authorized Signatory and Managing Director, Ranchi ….. Respondents ----- CORAM HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners: Mr. Ranjeet Kushwaha, Advocate For Res. Nos. 1, 2 & 3: Mr. Vibhor Mayank, A.C. to A.G. Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP-II For Res. Nos.4, 5 & 7: Mrs. Amrita Sinha, Advocate ----- 03/10.09.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. Ranjeet Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. He also places on record an e-mail communication dated 08.09.2026, which gives instruction not to pursue this writ petition and to withdraw the same. 2026:JHHC:27177-DB 2 | P a g e 3. Leave is granted. 4. The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of. (M. S. SONAK, C.J.) (RAJESH SHANKAR, J.) 10.09.2026 Satish/Vikas/