[2026:JHHC:27270] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4193 of 2026 Roshan Sanga, Aged about 27 years, Son of Vhinsent Sanga, Resident of Village- Harambanam, Dundigara, Khunti, PO- Dundigara, PS+Dist. Khunti. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Sanjana Kumari, Advocate. For the State : Mr. P.D. Agarwal, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 10.09.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 61(1) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned CJM, Khunti. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement. She next submits that the other co-accused persons have already been granted regular bail and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition. She also submits that the petitioner is nothing to do with the murder of the deceased. On these grounds, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is having two criminal antecedents and both the cases are registered under the Arms Act and other Sections. He next submits that it has come in the investigation that the arms and ammunitions were provided by this petitioner, which was used in the murder of one Soma Munda and the Deputy Commissioner has already granted sanction for [2026:JHHC:27270] -2- the purpose of arms. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. The petitioner is having two criminal antecedents and in those cases Arms Act and other Sections are involved and further in course of investigation, it has come that the petitioner has provided the arms and ammunition for using the same in the murder of Soma Munda and also for the arms the sanction is there by the Deputy Commissioner. In para-87 of the case diary, the name of the petitioner has come and further in para-97, again the name of this petitioner has come. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-10.09.2026 Amitesh/-