G.Keesavan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,
CRL OP(MD)/9529/2026 · 2026-05-20
R Vijayakumar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25544 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25544 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P(MD).No.9529 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. The present petition was disposed of on 20.05.2026. Today, it is listed under the caption “for being mentioned” at the instance of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. According to the
learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the sureties have to be executed to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Magistrate
No.II, Ramanathapuram. However, it is wrongly mentioned as the learned Additional District Judge, Paramakudi in paragraph No.6(a).
3. Considering the above said facts, the Registry is directed to incorporate the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram, in paragraph No. 6(a) and in the address column and issue fresh
order copy.
21.05.2026 Note: Issue order copy on 21.05.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis