Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010240382022
2026:GAU-AS:1573
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/740/2022 DEBO MALI D/O. LT. ARUN MALI, R/O. SONTOLA (MILANPUR) P.O. MIRZA, P.S.
PALASBARI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS KURTHI JALLI AND ANR THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND THE CHEIRMAN DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE, KAMRUP.
2:DR. NABAJYOTI DAS PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY DAKHIN KAMRUP COLLEGE MIRZA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R KALITA, MS N BORDOLOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR B CHOUDHURY (R-2), W AHMED (R-2)
BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R
06.02.2026
1. By order dated 08.02.2022 passed in WP(C) No. 704/2022, while interfering with the rejection of the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment by District Level Committee in its meeting
Page No.# 2/2 dated 18.03.2020, this court remanded the matter back to DLC, Kamrup (R) for a fresh consideration by taking note of initial application dated 26.10.2012 with further direction to consider the said application.
2. None appears for the petitioner on call.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 referring to the communication dated 07.03.2022 submits that the matter was directed to be placed before the next meeting of DLC along with detail report dated 16.03.2022. Subsequently, the Principal of the College submitted a detail report dated 16.03.2022 before the District Level Committee.
4. No notice has been issued to the respondent no. 1 as to whether the case of the petitioner was considered by the DLC.
5. Be that as it may, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 submits that in the meantime pursuant to selection process in the same college, for the post of Grade-IV she has been successful and the Governing Body of the college forwarded her name to the Director of Higher Education, Assam for approval.
6. Be that as it may, as none appears for the petitioner on call, this court presumes that the petitioner is not interested inasmuch as the recommendation was duly placed before the DLC.
7. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. However, if the petitioner is interested to revive this petition, she may file one page affidavit for such revival of this petition.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant