Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25538 (PNJ)

ASHISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.T., CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/30977/2026 · 2026-07-01

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-30977-2026 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 232 CRM-M-30977-2026 Decided on : 01.07.2026 Ashish Kumar Srivastava . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of UT Chandigarh . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Simsi Dhir Malhotra, Addl. PP UT, Chandigarh. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who have been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:- Name of Petitioner(s) FIR No. Date Section(s) Police Station District Ashish Kumar Srivastava 14 07.06.2025 S. 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 406 of IPC [corresponding S. 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) & 316(2) of BNS, 2023] EOW Chandigarh 2. Since by passing a detailed order dated 09.04.2026 (P-2), first regular bail petition, i.e., CRM-M-14132-2026, titled as, “Ashish Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.T. Chandigarh” was dismissed on merit by the Coordinate Bench of this Court (Mandeep Pannu, J.), no point for consideration in the second regular bail petition is made out, as the same is filed only for the reason that there is change of counsel and change in the JAWALA RAM 2026.07.02 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-30977-2026 - 2 - roster. 3. Dismissed. Pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 01, 2026 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2026.07.02 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document