Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25532 (KAR)

SRI U K SUBRAMANYA BHAT v. SMT K SHOBHA

WP/25786/2022 · 2026-06-30

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32342 WP No. 25786 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 25786 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. U.K. SUBRAMANYA BHAT S/O LATE U. GOPALAKRISHNA BHAT AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/AT MADDUPALU HOUSE KOTEKAR VILLAGE AND POST P.O KOTEKAR - 575 022 MANGALURU TALUK (DK). …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. SUDHAKAR PAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. K. SHOBHA W/O LATE VASANTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 2. MR. SHRIKANTH S.V. S/O LATE VASANTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32342 WP No. 25786 of 2022 BOTH ARE R/AT "SUMUKHA", NEAR THIRUVAIL SCHOOL P.O. VAMANJOOR - 575 028 MANGALURU TALUK (DK) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SEETHA RAMA RAO B.C, ADVOCATE AND SRI. ANUP SEETHARAM RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER ON PRELIMINARY ISSUE DATED 02.11.2022 IN OS.NO. 348/2019 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MANGALURU, D.K, (VIDE ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32342 WP No. 25786 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo indicating that writ petition rendered infructuous. 2. The memo reads as under:- " The above writ petition arising out of an order dated 02.11.2022 in O.S No.348/2019 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Mangaluru, D.K. The suit in O.S No.348/2019 itself is disposed off on 16.10.2024. As such, the said writ petition may kindly be disposed off as having been infurctuous in the interest of justice". 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49