Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25528 (JHR)

BIRENDRA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7739/2026 · 2026-09-10

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:27265 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7739 of 2026 Birendra Yadav … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rajesh Badri Yadav … Opposite Parties ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate For the State : A.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Bharat kumar, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sinha, Advocate Mr. Sparsh Kumar Rai, Adv. ------- 02/10.09.2026 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P as well as Mr. Rahul Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the informant. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected in B.A. No. 4845 of 2026 on 02.06.2026. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody for more than 6 months. It has further been submitted that he does not have any criminal antecedent and the occurrence has taken place at the spur of the moment. Learned A.P.P as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of the bail of the petitioner. It has been submitted by Mr. Rahul Sinha, learned counsel for the informant that on account of the assault committed upon the informant on his head with a Tangi he had suffered multiple head injuries which were opined to be grievous in nature. Regard being had to the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner which stands rejected once again at this stage. This application stands rejected. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Shamim/- Uploaded on: 11 /09/2026