Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25524 (KAR)

SRI VIDYA SHEERSHA THIRTHARU v. SRI RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD A S

WP/4321/2022 · 2026-06-30

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32346 WP No. 4321 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4321 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. VIDYA SHEERSHA THIRTHARU AGE 81 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PEETHADHIPATI ADDRESS: SRI VYASARAJA MUTT (SOSALE) GANDHI BAZAAR, BANGALORE - 560 004 REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTRONEY HOLDER SRI. RAGHVENDRA GULUR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH P. DALWAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD A.S, S/O SRI. N.S. APPU RAO AGE 61 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NOT KNOWN RESIDING AT NO.73, 2ND MAIN 11TH CROSS, THYAGARAJA NAGAR BANGALORE - 560 028. 2. SRI. K.V. ASWATHANARAYANA S/O SRI. K.R. VENKATESH MURTHY AGE 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NOT KNOWN RESIDING AT 21/3, 2ND MAIN Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32346 WP No. 4321 of 2022 3RD CROSS, CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE - 560 018. 3. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OFFICER, SRI VYSARAJA MUTT (SOSALE) GANDHI BAZAAR, BANGALORE - 560 004. 4. SRI. PUSHKARACHARYA @ SRI VIDYA VIJAYA TEERTHARU AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, NO.1226, 3RD MAIN 2ND CROSS, KRISHNAMURTHY PURAM MYSORE - 570 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.V. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. N.S. SRIHARI, ADVOOCATE FOR R3; SRI. K. SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATE 03.01.2022 PASSED BY THE XX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.6654/2017 (IA.NO.V) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K AND ALLOW THE IA NO.V AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32346 WP No. 4321 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents submits that in view of the order dated 19.11.2024 passed in MFA No.6998/2018 and connected appeals, this writ petition would not survive for consideration. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20