APHC010565082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 222/2025 Between: 1. BAPANAPALLI VENKATESWARLU, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 72 YEARS, COOLIE, R/O AARAVALLIPADU VILLAGE, DONAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. AADHAR NO.4039 6197 3742. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT B RAMADEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN, TAHSILDAR, DONAKONDA MANDAL, DONAKONDA PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. SRI SAYYED MASTAN VALI, S/O NOT KNOWN MANDAL SURVEYOR, DONAKONDA MANDAL, DONAKONDA. PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents for their willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the order dated 07-02-2024, passed in W.P.No.2242 of 2024 by this Hon’ble Court and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. YADAVALLI RAMESH 2 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 07.02.2024 passed in W.P.No.2442 of 2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that counter has been filed stating that on the F-line application of the petitioner, survey has been conducted and endorsement has been sent to the said effect. However, the same was refused by the petitioner to receive. In view of the same, delay has been occurred. Accordingly, prayed to close the contempt case. 3. Respondent/contemnors appeared before this Court and submitted that the said delay is neither willful nor wanton and tendered unconditional apology. 4. Taking their submissions into consideration, as the authorities have already complied the orders of this Court dated 07.02.2024, and having satisfied with the explanation for delay, this Court is inclined to dismiss the contempt case. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 29th January, 2026 RKS