APHC010566222014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16770/2014 Between: 1. ANAGANI DANAIAH,KRISHNA DIST, S/O.MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O.VADALI. POST & VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVT OF AP PRL SCY ENDOWMENTS HYD 4, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - ENDOWMENTS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI JAGANNADHA SWAMI VARI DEVASTHANAM, VADALI VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GENERAL, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA. 5. A P ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Prohibition, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 & 4 in filing eviction 2 petition vide OA No.76/2014 under Sec.83 of the Act 30 of 1987 before the 5th Respondent and the action of the 5th Respondent in entertaining the said petition is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and quash the same IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 20832 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in OA No.76/2014 pending on the file of the 5th Respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 2. PULIPATI RADHIKA The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16770/2014 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the orders dated 24.03.2025 passed in O.A.No.76 of 2014, the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 03.03.2026 TPS 4 105 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 16770/2014 03.03.2026 TPS