Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25513 (JHR)

ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8403/2026 · 2026-09-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:27065 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8403 of 2026 ------ Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Singh, aged about 19 years, son of Sattan Ram, resident of Kalabari, Lal Khothi, P.O. & P.S.- Jirwabari, Dist.-Sahibganj … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 09.09.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No.82 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 118(1)/ 118(2)/ 109(1)/303(2)/351(3)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant by giving him knife blows. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is specific allegation against the co-accused-Deepak Paswan and Naveen Paswan of catching hold of the informant and others and Rahul Paswan giving the knife blows. It is then submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was along with the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.17 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 18 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sahibganj, in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No.82 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09.09.2026 Gunjan-