1 CGHC010192362020 2026:CGHC:28218 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1966 of 2020 1 - Smt. Radha Jha W/o Late Shri Durganand Jha Aged About 70 Years Resident Of Gole Bazar , Ward Number 25, Rajnandgaon Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Land And Disaster Management Department , Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Rajnandgaon , District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rani Suryamukhi Devi Rajgami Sampada Trust Through Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Chief Executive Officer Rani Suryamukhi Devi Rajgami Sampada Committee, District Office Premises , Rajnandgaon District Rajnanadgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Rajnandgaon , Cum Manager Rani Suryamukhi Devi Rajgami Sampada Committee , District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chairman Rani Suryamukhi Devi Rajgami Sampada Committee 2 District Office Premises, Collectorate, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Meena Jha Wd/o Late Girish Jha Aged About 47 Years Resident Of Kaurinbhata Sahdev Nagar , Ward Number 22, Lane Number Two, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) No. 1 & 2/State : Mr. Amit Buxy, P.L. For Respondent(s) No. 3 to 5 : Mr. B.P. Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate SB- Hon’ble Shri Justic Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 08/07/2026 1. Heard. 2. By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has questioned the impugned order dated 04/09/2019 (Annexure P/5) passed by the Tahsildar and Manager, Rajgami Sampada Trust, Rajnandgaon whereby application filed by respondent No. 6 for allotment of the plot/shop in the name of her major son namely Saurabh Jha has been rejected. 3. During the pendency of this writ petition, the son of respondent No. 6 namely Saurabh Jha has also died on 26/12/2022. 3 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that since the property in question was recorded in the name of Late Girish Jha, therefore, it be allotted to his wife Smt. Meena Jha i.e. respondent No. 6 and the petitioner has no locus to seek allotment of the said property in her name. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of respondent No. 6 to move appropriate representation for allotment of the property in question in her name before respondents No. 3 and 4 within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, which will be considered and decided by them absolutely in accordance with law within two months from the date of filing of the representation. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Harneet