- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32623 WP No. 13832 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 13832 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMACHANDRA, S/O. GUJJAPPA, AGE 71 YEARS, 2. SRI. HARISH R., S/O. RAMACHANDRA R., AGE 41 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT NO.42, FIRST FLOOR, SRI. LAKSHMIVENKATESWARA NILAYA, 9TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR ICICI BANK ATM, HONGASANDRA NORTH, BENGALURU - 560068. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N.SURESHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., B.H.ROAD, TUMKUR - 572103. REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER / AUTHORISED OFFICER 2. PRAKASH R., S/O. RAMACHADNRA, AGE 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.42, FIRST FLOOR, SRI. LAKSHMIVENKATESWARA NILAYA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32623 WP No. 13832 of 2024 9TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR ICICI BANK ATM, HONGASANDRA NORTH, BENGALURU - 560068. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MOUNIKA M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. LOKESH K.V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 29.06.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioners it was ordered to be listed on 01.07.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears for the petitioners on the next date of hearing, suitable order will be passed. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32623 WP No. 13832 of 2024 The petition is listed today. A perusal of the petition papers would reflect that the petition is filed in 2024. Now we are in 2026. The petition is pending for two years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10