Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25511 (AP)

S.Venkatapathi Vijaya Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/649/2017 · 2026-02-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010571782017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 649/2017 Between: 1. S.VENKATAPATHI VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA RAJU HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OM ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER & CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, SRI VCNKATESWARA COOPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORY LTD. GAJULAMANDYAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT RIO SUGAR FACTORY QUARTERS, GAJULAMANDYAM, RENIGUNTA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (SUGARS ) DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF SUGAR AND CANE COMMISSIONER, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) 2. HARINATH REDDY SOMA 2 W.P.No.649 of 2017 The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was already retired from service long back and therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:06.02.2026 Dvs 3 W.P.No.649 of 2017 155 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.649 of 2017 Date: 06.02.2026 Dvs