Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25506 (AP)

Dhulipala Manikyala Rao v. Sri R. Mutyala Raju

CC/134/2016 · 2026-02-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010564552016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 134/2016 Between: 1. DHULIPALA MANIKYALA RAO, S/O LATE D. JAVALAYYA, AGED 42 YEARS, WORKING AS LINE MAN, APEPDCL, SUB-STATION RANGAPURAM, LINGAPALLEM MANDAL, VELIVENNU POST, UNDERAJAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI R MUTYALA RAJU, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.EASTREN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LIMITTED, (APEPDCL) VISAKHAPATNAM, SEETAMMADHARA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM, DISTRCT, STATE OF A.P. 2. AJAY JAIN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, THE STATE OF A.P. ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI A SURYANARAYANA, THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRD) APEPDCL, SEETHARRINIADHARA, GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SRI CH SATYANARAYANA REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (OPERATION) APEPDCL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. KALLI NAGESWARA RAO, THE DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, OPERATION, APEPDCL, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 C.C.No.134 of 2016 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for willful disobedance of the interim orders passed in W.P. No. 29509 of 2015, dated 10-9-2015 granted by His Lordship Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Kantha Rao J, under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) 2. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 3. METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO 3 C.C.No.134 of 2016 The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Order dated 10.09.2015 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29509 of 2015 has been complied with. 2. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:06.02.2026 Dvs 4 C.C.No.134 of 2016 179 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 134/2016 Date: 06.02.2026 Dvs