1 CGHC010043632021 2026:CGHC:28360 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1223 of 2021 1. (Deleted) Sunder Lal Verma (Died Through Nominee) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 19-03-2026 1.1 - Ku. Eshika Verma (Minor) Aged About 15 Years Through Natural Guardian Father Sunil Kumar Verma S/o Bhagoli Ram Verma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Mamta Nagar, Ward No. 19, Gali No. 05, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagarh, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Director Government Printing And Stationary Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Deputy Director Regional Government Printing And Stationary Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Lrs. of Petitioner : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate For State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09.07 .2026 1. Mr. Agrawal would contend that the default pointed out by the Registry has already been rectified. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):- “10.1. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition by treating the period of suspension from 07.02.2004 to 12.02.2013 be SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.07.09 13:59:02 +0530 2 treated on duty and wages for that period including increments etc. be granted with interest @ 18% per annum and also to grant the petitioner, the third time bound pay scale as per circular Annexure P/12 within stipulated period since as per Annexure P/12, the matter is shown to be pending, the matter cannot be kept pending for indefinite period, therefore suitable direction to decide within stipulated period be granted, because 7 years has been elapsed from the date of appeal i.e. 22.03.2013 as clear from Annexure P/8. 10.2 Costs of the petition be awarded and 10.3 Any other relief or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deems fit, be also awarded.” 3. Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Government Advocate would contend that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and order passed by the authority concerned dated 28.04.2022 has been placed on record as Annexure R/1. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive the prayer, if cause of action still subsists. 5. Permission granted. 6. Accordingly, this petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant