Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010005152026 2026:GAU-AS:3388 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/20/2026 SRI CHANDAN RABHA S/O- LAKSHESWAR RABHA, RESIDENT OF VILL - TATLAPARA THAMANA, P.O- THAMANA, P.S- MUSHALPUR, DISTBAKSA, ASSAM, PIN- 781377. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM 2:SRI SANJAY DAS S/O- MATIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF VILL - KUROBAHA SALAIPARA P.O- TUPALI PANBARI P.S. PATACHARKUCHI DIST- BAJAI ASSAM PIN-781329 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KALITA, MR. N M DAS,MR. J HATIMURIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.Rev.P./14/2026 SRI CHANDAN RABHA S/O- LAKSHESWAR RABHA RESIDENT OF VILL - TATLAPARA THAMANA P.O- THAMANA P.S- MUSHALPUR DISTBAKSA ASSAM PIN- 781377. Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM 2:SRI SANJAY DAS S/O- MATIRAM DAS RESIDENT OF VILL - KUROBAHA SALAIPARA P.O- TUPALI PANBARI P.SPATACHARKUCHI DIST- BAJAI ASSAM PIN781329. ------------ Advocate for : MR. M KALITA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER 06-03-2026 Heard Mr. M. Kalita, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. This is an application under Section 430(2) of BNSS, 2023 for suspension of sentence and to grant bail to the petitioner. 3. It is submitted by Mr. Kalita, learned counsel that against the impugned judgment and order dated 08.11.2024, passed by the learned SDJM (M), Bajali in N.I. Case No. 50/2021, the petitioner preferred an appeal being Crl. A. No. 22/2024 and vide judgment and order dated 01.11.2025, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bajali, the appeal was partly allowed and the petitioner was directed to pay compensation amount of Rs.7,00,000/- to the Page No.# 3/3 complainant/respondent No.2 with default stipulation. 4. Accordingly, Mr. Kalita, learned counsel submitted that till the disposal of the connected revision petition, which has been filed against the order of the learned Sessions Judge as stated above, may be stayed/suspended. He further submitted that the petitioner may be allowed to remain on previous bail. 5. Hearing the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, the operation of the impugned judgment dated 01.11.2025, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bajali in Crl. Appeal No. 22/2024 is hereby stayed. 6. With the above observation, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant