TARSEM LAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
CWP/18643/2026 · 2026-07-02
Namit Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25499 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25499 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CWP-18643 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18643 of 2026 Date of decision: 02.07.2026 Tarsem Lal and others
….Petitioners versus State of Punjab and others
….Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. K.R. Dhawan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, DAG, Punjab. Mr. S.S. Mann, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
NAMIT KUMAR
, J. (ORAL)
1. On the last date of hearing i.e. 01.07.2026, the following
order was passed: -
“The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court by filing the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to deposit their Contributory Provident Fund/General Provident Fund i.e. the amount deducted from their salaries and the contribution of the State alongwith interest into their respective accounts. On receipt of advance copy, Mr. S.S.Mann, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.4 – Nagar Council, Zira, District Ferozepur and has RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.02 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
2 CWP-18643 of 2026 filed MoA, which is taken on record. He prays for and is granted time to get instructions. List again on 02.07.2026.”
2.
Learned counsel for respondent No.4, on instructions, submits that necessary amount shall be deposited with the concerned authorities on or before 31.10.2026 as per rules.
3. In view of the said statement, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Disposed of accordingly. 02.07.2026
(NAMIT KUMAR) R.S.
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2026.07.02 19:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment