BIRSA MUNDA @ BIRA MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8407/2026 · 2026-09-09
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25499 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25499 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:27068 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8407 of 2026
------ Birsa Munda @ Bira Munda, aged about 25 years, son of Ganju Munda, resident of Jayardih, Peyakuli, P.O. & P.S.- Tamar, Dist.-Ranchi … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 09.09.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Kharsawan P.S. Case No.18 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1)/61(2)/238/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed murder of Baya Sardar. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co- accused-Sunita Sardar. It is then submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.17 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 18 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses
of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Seraikella, in connection with Kharsawan P.S. Case No.18 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
09.09.2026 Gunjan-