Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25490 (AP)

Smt. Gannina Varalakshmi v. Smt. Balusu Maniprabha

CRP/3138/2024 · 2026-02-08

Ravi Cheemalapati

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010568612024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3138/2024 Between: 1. SMT. GANNINA VARALAKSHMI,, W/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 60 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-13, MATAMGUDEM, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT BALUSU MANIPRABHA, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 52 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 8-192, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF POTHAVARAM VILLAGE, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SRI BALUSU SATISH KUMAR, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, MALE, AGE 36 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 8-192, PRESENTLY RESIDENT OF POTHAVARAM VILLAGE, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SMT TUMMALA JHANSIRANI, W/O KIRAN RAMESH, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 36 YEARS, R/O GUNTUPALLI VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SMT MANDALAPU SUBBA LAKSHMI, W/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE 60 YEARS, MATAMGUDEM, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be 2 pleased toPleased to set aside the Order in I.A.NO.440/2024 in O.S.NO.5/2015 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Eluru, vide order dated 18th day of October, 2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant stay of operation all further proceedings in O.S No.5/2015 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Eluru, pending disposal of the above Revision Petition, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P B NARASIMHA MURTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.440 of 2024 in O.S.No.5 of 2015 by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Eluru. 2. Sri P.Mahesh, learned counsel representing Sri P.B.Narasimha Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, reported that the suit itself has been disposed of and that the present civil revision petition has become infructuous. 3. Registry has also placed on record the case information status, which indicates that on 26.09.2025, the suit was disposed of. 4. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 09th February, 2026 JLV 4 475 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3138/2024 Date: 09th February, 2026 JLV