Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25482 (AP)

A.Yellaiah v. Dr S Aruna Kumar

CC/2009/2018 · 2026-03-10

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010567352018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2009/2018 Between: 1. A.YELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC SWEEPER/DHOBI, CONTINGENT EMPLOYEE IN UPHC, P.DORNALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR S ARUNA KUMAR, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH, STATE OF A.P., AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DR RAJYALAKSHMI, DISTRICT AND MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. DR M SRINIVASA RAO, MEDICAL OFFICER, UPGRADED PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE, P.DORNALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondent herein before this Hon'ble Court for willfully and deliberately disobeying the orders passed in W.P.No. 39586 of 2017 dt. 2-1-2018, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T PARIPURNA CHARY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SRINIVAS BOBBILI 2. 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2009 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Instant Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of interim order dated 02.01.2018 in WP No.39586 of 2017.. 2. On 10.03.2026, this Court passed an order which reads as under: <No representation for the petitioner. Ms.S.Pranavi, learned counsel for respondent No.3 brought to the notice of this Court that the main WP No.39586 of 2017 itself is dismissed for non- prosecution on 31.12.2025. However, so as to give on more opportunity to the petitioner, list the matter on 11.03.2026, under the caption <for orders=. < 3. Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the caption <for orders=. 4. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none represented the petitioner. 5. Ms.S.Pranavi, learned counsel for respondent No.3 reiterated her earlier submission that the main WP No.39586 of 2017 itself was dismissed on 31.12.2025. 3 6. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 11.03.2026 PSA