Mahtab Ali @ Mohtab Ali @ Md. Mohtab Khan @ Md. Mahtab Ali v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./17248/2026 · 2026-07-15
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25478 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25478 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17248 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Gaya ======================================================
1. Mahtab Ali @ Mohtab Ali @ Md. Mohtab Khan @ Md. Mahtab Ali S/o- Md. Jashim Ali R/v- Aliganj Road No-24, Ps- Chandauti Dist- Gaya
2. Umar Saheb @ Md. Umar S/o- Mahtab Ali @ Mohtab Ali @ Md. Mohtab Khan @ Md. Mahtab Ali R/v- Aliganj Road No-24, Ps- Chandauti Dist- Gaya
3. Vikash Kumar S/o- Shankar Mistri R/v- Aliganj Road No-24, Ps- Chandauti Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 15-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 351, 109, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, on 28.10.2025 at about 11 AM, when informant and her family members were cutting paddy crops in the field, these petitioners along with some unknown miscreants came there and assaulted them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17248 of 2026(3) dt.15-07-2026 2/2 parties are agnates and due to land dispute, simple maar-peet took place between them in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 2nd, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Mohanpur P. S. Case No. 405 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T