1 CGHC010233362026 2026:CGHC:28143 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3526 of 2026 1 - Smt. Anjali Ratre W/o Ramgopal Aged About 60 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Jhumuk Tandon S/o Rambharos Aged About 55 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Sudharu Mahilange S/o Jagdish Aged About 50 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Itwari Ghritlahre S/o Sukram Aged About 65 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Shyamlal S/o Punau Ram Ratre Aged About 62 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Sakun Ratre W/o Dhanu Ratre Aged About 64 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR 2 7 - Manju Joshi W/o Shambhu Aged About 32 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 8 - Ramgopal Ratre S/o Dheluram Aged About 65 Years Resident Of Village Korda, Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Balodabazar, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) 4 - The Tahsildar Tahsil Lawan, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner(s) :- Mr. A.D. Kuldeep, Advocate For State :- Mr. Amit Nayak, P.L. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 08.07.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appropriate application before the competent authority for allotment/regularization of the land, which 3 according to the petitioner has been in his possession since long, in accordance with the provisions of law. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and submits that if any such application is preferred before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. 3. Considering the aforesaid submissions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner, it is observed that if the petitioner files an appropriate application before the competent authority seeking allotment/regularization of the land in question within a period of 10 days from today, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of such application. 4. With the aforesaid liberty and observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha