APHC010564402017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1739/2017 Between: 1. MOKARA VENKATA RAO, VISAKHAPANTAM, S/O RAJANNA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT SWAGATH TAILORS, SEETHAMMAPETA, MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT MOKARA VARA LAKSHMI VISAKAPATNAM ANR REP PP, W/O VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44.YEARS, RESIDING AT KUMMARI VEEDHI, MAHARANIPETA WARD, VISAKHAPATNAM. RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELENGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Petition to this Honorable Court against the orders dated February, 2017 in M.P. No. 107 of 2014 in M.C. No. 23/ 1998 on the file of Family Court -cum V Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam for the following among other: IA NO: 1 OF 2017 (CRLRCMP 2781 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceeding including the Execution of the order dated 1st February, 2017 in M.P. No. 107 of 2014 in M.C. No 23 of 1998 (wrongly mentioned in the order as O.S. 23 of 1998) on the file of Family Court -cum- V Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition and pass such other orders as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) O R D E R This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioners/accused under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 01.02.2017 passed in M.C.No.23 of 1998 on the file of learned Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 01.02.2017 passed in M.C.No.23 of 1998. M.C.No.23 of 1998 has been filed by the respondent No.1 herein seeking to enhance the maintenance amount from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.7,000/- per month. By impugned order dated 01.02.2017, the trial Court partly allowed the petition by enhancing the maintenance amount from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.4,000/- per month. Against the said order, the respondent No.1 herein preferred the revision. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that matter has become infructuous due to change of circumstances and requests to close this matter. 5. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous due to change of circumstances. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 06.01.2026 M K K THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1739 of 2017 Date: 06.01.2025 M K K 50