- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32715 W.P. No.2622/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.2622/2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. KIRAN REDDY SAGAM S/O KOTI REDDY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS MANAGING DIRECTOR OF M/S SAAGAM REALITY PVT LTD CORPORATE OFFICE NO.78 1ST FLOOR, OUTER RING ROAD BELLANDUR BANGALORE AND ALSO SINDHU NAGAR GOWTHAMANAGAR 5TH CROSS EXTENSION SINDHU NAGAR LAYOUT ROBERTSONPET, KGF-563122. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJADITHYA SADASIVAN, ADV., [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. LAKSHMI NARAYAN .G S/O GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A D-BLOCK, LOWER MUSKAN ANDERSONPET, KGF-563113. 2. SRI. KONDANDARAMMA G S/O GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A D-BLOCK, LOWER MUSKAN ANDERSONPET, KGF-563113. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32715 W.P. No.2622/2021 3. SRI. SURESH KUMAR .K S/O KUPPUSWAMY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/A C BLOCK, LOWER MUSKAN ANDERSONPET, KGF-563113. 4. SRI. RAGHU NAIDU .R S/O ARUMUGAM NAIDU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/A A-BLOCK, LOWER MUSKAN ANDERSONPET, KGF-563113. 5. SRI. DEVARAJ NAIDU R S/O RAMASWAMY NAIDU AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/A A-BLOCK, LOWER MUSKAN ANDERSONPET, KGF-563113. 6. SRI. SHANMUGAM S/O EKAMBARAM AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A C-BLOCK, LOWER MUSKAN ANDERSONPET, KGF-563113. 7. SRI. RAVI S/O MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A B-BLOCK, LOWER MUSKAN ANDERSONPET, KGF-563113. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANGAMESH R.B. ADV., FOR R1 TO R5 & R7) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.16.1.2021 IN M.A.NO.8/2020 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT K.G.F IN ANENXURE-A & ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32715 W.P. No.2622/2021 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Even on 19.06.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4