Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25453 (KAR)

SMT. SAKAMMA v. K. SHANKARA NARAYANA GOWDA

WP/812/2021 · 2026-06-30

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32347 WP No. 812 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 812 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. SAKAMMA D/O. KEMPANNA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT DODDARAHALLI VILLAGE, ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. NEERAJA KARANTH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. K. SHANKARA NARAYANA GOWDA S/O. LATE KUVANNA, AGED 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT MALLANGURKI VILLAGE, ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32347 WP No. 812 of 2021 2. CHIKKA MUNIYAMMA W/O. LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. SHANTHAMMA W/O. LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED 43 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDING AT DODDARAHALLI VILLAGE, ROBERTSONPET HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.J. JAGADEESHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R3 - SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2020 IN O.S.NO.130/2014 (OLD NO.O.S.NO.2/2014 FILED IN VACATION COURT, RENUMBERED LATER AS O.S.NO.130/2014) ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANGARPET, FILED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32347 WP No. 812 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo indicating that the parties have settled the dispute amicably. 2. The memo reads as under:- "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner respectfully submits that as the parties have settled the dispute between them amicably before the Court below, this Petition may kindly be disposed of as infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity". 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4