Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25451 (KAR)

MR. JEYAKUMAR SOLAIAPPAN v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/8682/2022 · 2026-07-02

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33004 WP No. 8682 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 8682 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR. JEYAKUMAR SOLAIAPPAN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O. MR. SOLAIAPPAN, 2. MRS. SELVAKUMARI J., AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, W/O. MR. JEYAKUMAR SOLAIAPPAN, PETITIONER NOS. 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO.123, KVK NAGAR WEST, IV GATE ETTAYAPURAM ROAD EXT, THOOTHKKUDI-628 008. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 2. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ESTABLISHED UNDER THE RESERVED BANK OF INDIA ACT, HAVING ONE OF ITS OFFICE AT NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33004 WP No. 8682 of 2022 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 3. HILIFE VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.137/1 AND 137/2, BALAGERE GUNJUR ROAD, GUNJUR, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 087. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. KONDURU CHANDRA MOHAN REDDY. 4. STATE BANK OF INDIA, WHITEFIELD BRANCH, NO.117, NEILRAO TOWERS, RD NUMBER 3, EPIP PHASE-1, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU-560 066. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER. 5. STATE BANK OF INDIA, PANATHUR BRANCH, NO.132/8, PANATHUR JUNCTION, PANATHUR, MARATHALLI-560 103. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARSHA P.BANAD, CGC FOR R1; SRI. S.RAJSHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R2 AND R5 ARE SERVED AS PER POSTRAL TRACK; VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 02.07.2026, R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33004 WP No. 8682 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Sri.Srinivas V., counsel for the petitioners, Sri.Harsha P.Banad, CGC for respondent No.1 and Sri.S.Rajashekar, counsel for respondent No.4 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21