APHC010564272018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26853/2018 Between: 1. GANGANNAGARI JAMUNA,, W/O G. SREENIVASULU, HINDU, 37 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, DEVIREDDIGARIPALLI VILLAGE. H/O BASINIKONDA, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVARHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering with the petitioners possession of land to an extent of Ac.0.65 cents in S.No.24/6, Ac.0.90 cents in S.No.22/8 2 JS,J W.P.No.26853 of 2018 and Ac.3.05 cents in S.No.43/5 of Venkappakota Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Chittoor District as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, so long as petitioners D- Form Patta vide AM.No.15/19 JB/1413 dated 31.07.2003 is subsisting and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue in possession of the above said lands and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to evict the petitioner from the possession of the land to an extent of Ac.0.65 cents in S.No.24/6, Ac.0.90 cents in S.No.22/8 & Ac.3.05 cents in S.No.43/5 of Venkappakota Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Chittoor District pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) This Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.26853 of 2018 ORDER: On 06.03.2026, at the request of the counsel for the petitioner to furnish bank account details, the matter was adjourned to 16.03.2026. As the counsel for the petitioner could not furnish the bank account details on that date, the matter was adjourned by a further period of two weeks. Today when the matter is called, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not responding. Therefore, the writ petition can be closed with liberty to the petitioner to file an application to reopen the writ petition. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader submits that the compensation amount could not be paid solely due to non-furnishing of bank account details by the petitioner. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before this Court to reopen the writ petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 30th March, 2026 cbs 4 JS,J W.P.No.26853 of 2018 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.26853 of 2018 30th March, 2026 cbs