Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25438 (KAR)

SRI A FRANCIS ALIS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19307/2026 · 2026-06-30

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32464 WP No. 19307 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19307 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. A. FRANCIS ALIS S/O ANTHONY SWAMY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.86, DODDABASAVANAPURA, K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU EAST, BENGALURU - 560 049. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGESH M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, BENGLAURU - 560 001. 2. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 562 101 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MULABAGAL TALUK, MULABAGAL - 563 131. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32464 WP No. 19307 of 2026 5. THE CHIEF SECRETARY, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, KOLAR - 563 101. 6. REVENUE INSPECTOR GOKUNTE REVENUE CIRCLE H.GOLLAHALLI PANCHAYATH DUGGASANDRA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK - 563 131 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE S P OFFICE, KOLAR - 563 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REMOVE THE ENDORSEMENT AND MAKE WAY FOR PATHWAY FOR GENERAL PUBLIC IN SY.NO.111, MEASURING 0.07 1/2 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT GOKUNTE VILLAGE,DUGGASANDRA HOBLI, MULABAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 7. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is to direct respondent No.4 to consider the claim - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32464 WP No. 19307 of 2026 made by the petitioner at Annexure-K to the writ petition, which has not been done till date. 3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representation within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29