Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25432 (AP)

GOMPA MANIKYAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/9002/2022 · 2026-03-17

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010563432022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: 1. GOMPA MANIKYAM, S/O.PENTAYYA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED. PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/O. D.NO.3 MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. GOMPA NOOKAALAMMA, W/O. G.MANIKYAM, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. HOMEMAKER, PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/O. D.NO.3 PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. GOMPA GANGA BABU YEARS, OCC.FARMER, PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE, R/O. D.NO.3 PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. GOMPA BUJJI, C/O. TALLURIVEERRAJU, D/O. MANIKYAM, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. HOME MAKER, R/O. D.NO. 52 PETA, NARASIMHA RAO ROAD, JAGANNADHAPURAM, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 2. G SURYAMANI, W/O. G. NOOKA RAJU, D/O. G. VERRAJU, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2 KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9002 OF 2022 GOMPA MANIKYAM, S/O.PENTAYYA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED. PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/O. D.NO.3-105, GAJJANAPUDI VILLAGE, MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. NOOKAALAMMA, W/O. G.MANIKYAM, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. HOMEMAKER, PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE R/O. D.NO.3-105, GAJJANAPUDI VILLAGE, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA GOMPA GANGA BABU GANGA RAJU,, S/O. MANIKYA YEARS, OCC.FARMER, PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE, R/O. D.NO.3-105, GAJJANAPUDI VILLAGE, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA C/O. TALLURIVEERRAJU, D/O. MANIKYAM, AGED 36 ME MAKER, R/O. D.NO. 52-1-80/7, KUNTHI DEVI PETA, NARASIMHA RAO ROAD, JAGANNADHAPURAM, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH -533002. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI G SURYAMANI, W/O. G. NOOKA RAJU, D/O. G. VERRAJU, AGED 24 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-264/C, B.C. COLONY, VAKALAPUDI VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): on under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY GOMPA MANIKYAM, S/O.PENTAYYA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED. PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT NOS.2 PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. NOOKAALAMMA, W/O. G.MANIKYAM, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. HOMEMAKER, PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT 105, GAJJANAPUDI VILLAGE, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA GANGA RAJU,, S/O. MANIKYAM, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC.FARMER, PETITIONER NOS.2 TO 4 / RESPONDENT 105, GAJJANAPUDI VILLAGE, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA C/O. TALLURIVEERRAJU, D/O. MANIKYAM, AGED 36 80/7, KUNTHI DEVI PETA, NARASIMHA RAO ROAD, JAGANNADHAPURAM, KAKINADA, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF G SURYAMANI, W/O. G. NOOKA RAJU, D/O. G. VERRAJU, AGED 24 264/C, B.C. COLONY, VAKALAPUDI VILLAGE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): on under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to call for the records pertaining to D.V.C.No.18/2022 on the file of the V Additional Judicial First-Class Magistrate Court, Kakinada, AP, U/s. 19 to 22 of the Domestic Violence Act and quash the same against the Petitioners/Respondents nos. 1 to 4, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 10 days in representing the Crl.P SR No.10384 of 2022 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the certified copy of the complaint D.V.C. No.18/2022 on the file of the V Additional Judicial First-Class Magistrate, Kakinada in the interest of justice. IA NO: 3 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in D.V.C. No. 18/2022 on the file of the V Additional Judicial First-Class Magistrate Court, Kakinada, AP, U/s. 19 to 22 of the Domestic Violence Act against the Petitioners/Respondents Nos.1 to 4, pending disposal of the main Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. E V V S RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following Order : This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners herein, to quash the proceedings in D.V.C.No.18 of 2022 on the file of Court of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada. 2. When the matter of taken up for hearing, Mr. Balakrishna, learned counsel, representing Mr. Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, both the parties compromised, and pursuant to a petition filed to that effect, the aforesaid DVC has been dismissed against the petitioners herein, vide Order, dated 18.12.2025 in D.V.C.No.18 of 2022 on the file of the Court of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kakinada. 3. In view of the same, no further orders are required to be passed in the instant Criminal Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as in fructuous. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ K.SREENIVASA REDDY, J Date: 18.03.2026 KK