1 CGHC010413302022 2026:CGHC:28483 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5621 of 2022 Hemlal Sahu S/o Gokul Sahu Aged About 78 Years Caste - Teli, R/o. Village - Jaijaipur, Police Station And Tehsil - Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.). Through Special Power Of Attorney Holder Namely - Ramkumar Sahu, S/o. Shri Firat Ram Sahu, Aged About - 32 Years, R/o. Village - Rogda, Tehsil - Navagarh, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir - Champa, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh 2 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh 3 - Tehsildar Jaijaipur District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh 4 - Patwari Patwari Halka No. 16, Jaijaipur, Post, Police Station And Tehsil - Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh 5 - Revenue Inspector Jaijaipur, Post, Police Station And Tehsil - Jaijaipur, District - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rijwan Alam, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 09.07.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the circumstances which had given rise to filing of the petition have undergone a change YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.09 18:21:46 +0530 2 and, by efflux of time, the relief sought for in the present writ petition has already become infructuous. He, therefore, submits that nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition and the same may accordingly be disposed of as having rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid submission and submits that he has no objection if the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having regard to the changed circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. Since the relief claimed by the petitioner has become infructuous by efflux of time, the present writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh