RAM KRISHAN Versus HPTDC AND OTHERS CMP-9907 of 2026 in EX.P. - 695 of 2025 29.09.2026 Present: Mr. Himanshu Kapila, Senior Advocate vice Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Harmender Singh, Advocate, for the respondent. Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that in terms of the judgment sought to be executed, consequential benefits stand granted to the petitioner, save and except arrears on account of the revised pay scale, which issue is pending adjudication before the learned Single Judge in a case titled Tulsi Ram Vs. HPTDC. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and, accordingly, the same are closed at this stage, reserving liberty to the petitioner to get the present petition revived after disposal of Tulsi Ram’s case, if required and desired. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 29, 2026 (Sunil)