Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25425 (KAR)

VENKATESHA v. STATE BY KIKKERI P S

CRL.P/1032/2021 · 2026-07-02

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32893 CRL.P No. 1032 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1032 OF 2021 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. VENKATESHA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA HALEMADAPURA VILALGE KEKKERI HOBLI, K R PETE TALUKU MANDYA 571401. 2. MANJUNATH H V AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O VENKATESHA HALEMADAPURA VILALGE LIKKERI HOBI, K R PETE TALUK MANDYA 571401. 3. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O VENKATESHA HALEMADAPURA VILALGE LIKKERI HOBI, K R PETE TALUK MANDYA 571401. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANDEEP KATTI.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32893 CRL.P No. 1032 of 2021 AND: 1. STATE BY KIKKERI P S REPRESENTED BY SSP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE 560001. 2. BOJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA R/A HALEMADAPURA VILLAGE KIKKERI HOBLI, K R PETE TLAUK MANDYA-571401. …RESPONDENTS (BY Smt.SOWMYA R, HCGP FOR R1,. SRI N SURESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER TAKING COGNIZANCE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 341, 504, 324, 326, 354, 323, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS TO THE PETITIONERS VIDE ORDER DATED 03.12.20219 PASSED BY THE HONOURABLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., K.R.PET IN C.C.NO.564/2019. (CR.NO.178/2016) AND QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISAHBLE UNDER SECTIONS 341, 504, 324, 326, 354, 323, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32893 CRL.P No. 1032 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a Memo stating that during pendency of above petition, proceedings before Trial Court had ended with an order of acquittal rendering petition infructuous. Taking Memo on record, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38