1 APHC010564602016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2295/2016 Between: 1. PANGI PUNYAVATHI,, W/O ESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, ANGANWADI HELPER, PATA PADERU, PADERU PROJECT VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. G CHINMAYADEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN, AGE: NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, ICDS VISAKHAPATNAM , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. P LALITHA KUMARI, W/O E. VIJAY KUMAR, AGE: 45 YEARS, CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, PADERU PROJECT, PADERU, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemptnors/respondents for their wilful disobedience of not implementing the orders of the Honble Court passed in W.P.M.P.No.8530 of 2016 in W.P.No.6694 of 2016 dated 2-03-2016 and to dedare the impugned action as illegal, arbitrary and contemptuous under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 under these facts and circumstances of the case and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(APPL 9201 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to condone the delay of (24) days in re-submitting the case SR.No.8091 of 2016. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B GEETA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2295/2016 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 02.03.2016 passed in W.P.M.P.No.8530 of 2016 in W.P. No.6694 of 2016. 2. When the matter was taken up, Ms.Keerthi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms.B.Geeta, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the main writ petition was disposed on 19.09.2024. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondents. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 17.02.2026 S D P 4 38 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2295/2016 17.02.2026 W S D P