1 2026:CGHC:4236 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 684 of 2023 Priyanka Yadav W/o Hemant Kumar Yadav Aged About 26 Years Occupation House Wife, R/o Pakargaon Tahsil- Pathlgaon, At Present Address Residing To Her Grand Father (Nana) Chandoram S/o Late Raturam R/o Village Chindora, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus Hemant Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Durga Mahan Yadav Aged About 28 Years Occupation Government Job, R/o Village Pakargaon, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Vivek Kumar Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 23.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Vivek Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The present revision has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: “ It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the appeal and set-aside the order dated 07.02.2023 passed in Case No.52/2019, by learned Judge of family court Jashpur (C.G.) in Miscellaneous Criminal case No. 52/2019, in the interest of justice. ” 3. The present criminal revision is beyond time as has been reported by the Registry. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 4. From perusal of application for condonation of delay, it is apparent that the applicant has not given day to day explanation of inordinate delay of 29 days in filing the revision, as such, the revision is barred by delay and laches and is not liable to be entertained. 5. Considering the grounds raised in I.A. No. 01/2023, I do not find any good ground to condone the delay of 29 days in preferring the revision. 6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2023 is rejected and consequently thereto, the revision is also dismissed. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar